Enterprise Risk (ERM)
Enterprise Risk (ERM)
Gaps become owned risks automatically, with no re-keying between the finding and the register.
Inherent vs residual
on one model
Appetite
enforced, not decorative
Why it matters
From scattered to connected.
The old way
The register drifts from reality
- A failed control is re-keyed into a risk by hand
- Appetite is a slide, not a control
- KRIs update on a monthly copy-paste
With Compliverse
Gaps become owned risks on their own
- A finding flows into the register with no re-keying
- Breach the appetite and the workflow escalates it
- KRIs and the heatmap score off the same graph, live
What you get
Built for the way regulated teams actually work.
Register & appetite
Score inherent against residual and hold the register to a stated appetite.
KRIs & analytics
Set KRI thresholds and read the exposure on a live heatmap and bow-tie view.
RCSA campaigns
Run control self-assessments across the business and roll the results up.
Enforced escalation
Breach a threshold and the workflow engine escalates it to the committee that owns it.
End to end
How it flows
- 1IdentifyGap or incident
- 2ScoreInherent vs residual
- 3TreatOwner and plan
- 4MonitorKRI thresholds
- 5ReportBoard view
Linked into
A record here never sits alone. The moment it exists, it connects to:
ControlsAssetsVendorsIncidentsRCSAAppetiteKRIs
Beyond the point tools
Appetite is enforced, not decorative, breach a threshold and the workflow engine escalates it to the committee that owns it.
See enterprise risk (erm) on your own stack.
Demos are scoped to your regulators. Pick a slot and we'll run it live.